We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The WG drafts that extend HTTP/1 should be consistent with the terminology of RFC7230 and RFC7231. That means s/headers/header fields/g;.
s/headers/header fields/g;
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems to have been addressed.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The WG drafts that extend HTTP/1 should be consistent with the terminology of RFC7230 and RFC7231. That means
s/headers/header fields/g;
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: