-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
extended_euclidean__a_ge_0__b_gt_a.h
406 lines (379 loc) · 21.2 KB
/
extended_euclidean__a_ge_0__b_gt_a.h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
// --- This file is distributed under the MIT Open Source License, as detailed
// in the file "LICENSE.TXT" in the root of this repository ---
// For Definitions and Theorems P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, see
// extended_euclidean_collins.h
#ifndef EXTENDED_EUCLIDEAN__A_GE_0__B_GT_A
#define EXTENDED_EUCLIDEAN__A_GE_0__B_GT_A 1
#ifndef NDEBUG
# include "assert_helper_gcd.h"
#endif
#include <assert.h>
#include <limits>
#if defined(assert_invariant) || defined(assert_precondition)
# error "assert_invariant and/or assert_precondition were already defined"
#endif
// assert aliases will help self-document the code
#define assert_invariant assert
#define assert_precondition assert
template <typename T>
void extended_euclidean__a_ge_0__b_gt_a(T a, T b, T* pGcd, T* pX, T* pY)
{
static_assert(std::numeric_limits<T>::is_integer, "");
static_assert(std::numeric_limits<T>::is_signed, "");
/*01*/ assert_precondition(b > a);
/*02*/ assert_precondition(a >= 0);
/*03*/ T x0 = 1;
/*04*/ T y0 = 0;
/*05*/ T a0 = a;
/*06*/ T x1 = 0;
/*07*/ T y1 = 1;
/*08*/ T a1 = b;
/*09*/ assert(b > 0); // By [01, 02]
// This loop would be taken at least once, since by [08, 09] a1 > 0.
// So we will peel out the first iteration from the loop, and place it
// prior to the start of the loop.
// while (a1 != 0) {
// T q = a0/a1;
// T a2 = a0 - q*a1;
// T x2 = x0 - q*x1;
// T y2 = y0 - q*y1;
//
// x0 = x1;
// y0 = y1;
// a0 = a1;
// x1 = x2;
// y1 = y2;
// a1 = a2;
// }
// The peeled-out first iteration:
{
/*10*/ T q = a0/a1;
/*11*/ assert(q == 0);
// Proof: By [01, 02] b > a >= 0. By [08,05] a1 == b and a0 == a,
// thus a1 > a0 >= 0. By [10] q == a0/a1, thus q == 0.
// Note: We do NOT have (1 <= q && q <= a0), since by [11] q == 0.
/*12*/ T a2 = a0 - q*a1;
/*H0*/ assert(q <= a0/2);
// Proof: By [11, 02, 05] q == 0 == 0/2 <= a/2 == a0/2
/*13*/ assert(q*a1 == 0); // By [11]
// Note: We do NOT have (0 < (q*a1) && (q*a1) <= a0), since by
// [13] 0 == q*a1.
/*14*/ assert(a2 == a);
// Proof: By [05, 13] a0 == a and q*a1 == 0. By [12],
// a2 == a0 - q*a1, so a2 == a - 0 == a.
/*15*/ assert(0 <= a2 && a2 < a1);
// By [14, 02] a2 == a >= 0, so 0 <= a2. By [08, 01, 14],
// a1 == b > a == a2, so a2 < a1.
/*16*/ T x2 = x0 - q*x1;
/*17*/ assert(x2 == 1);
// Proof: By [03, 11] x0 == 1 and q == 0. By [16],
// x2 == x0 - q*x1 == 1 - 0*x1 == 1.
/*18*/ assert(abs(q*x1) <= abs(x2));
// Proof: By [11, 17] q == 0 and x2 == 1, so
// abs(q*x1) == abs(0*x1) == 0 <= 1 == abs(x2).
/*19*/ assert(abs(x1) <= abs(x2));
// Proof: By [06, 17] abs(x1) == 0 <= 1 == abs(x2).
/*20*/ T y2 = y0 - q*y1;
/*21*/ assert(y2 == 0);
// Proof: By [04, 11] y0 == 0 and q == 0. By [20],
// y2 == y0 - q*y1 == 0 - 0*y1 == 0.
/*22*/ assert(abs(q*y1) <= abs(y2));
// Proof: By [11, 21] q == 0 and y2 == 0, so
// abs(q*y1) == abs(0*y1) == 0 <= 0 == abs(y2).
// Note: We do NOT have (abs(y1) <= abs(y2)), since by [07, 21],
// abs(y1) == 1 > 0 == abs(y2).
/*H1*/ assert(y1 == 1); // By [07]
/*23*/ x0 = x1;
/*24*/ y0 = y1;
/*25*/ a0 = a1;
/*26*/ assert(x0 == 0); // By [23, 06] x0 == x1 == 0.
/*27*/ assert(y0 == 1); // By [24, 07] y0 == y1 == 1.
/*28*/ assert(a0 == b); // By [25, 08] a0 == a1 == b.
/*29*/ x1 = x2;
/*30*/ y1 = y2;
/*31*/ a1 = a2;
/*32*/ assert(x1 == 1); // By [29, 17] x1 == x2 == 1.
/*33*/ assert(y1 == 0); // By [30, 21] y1 == y2 == 0.
/*34*/ assert(a1 == a); // By [31, 14] a1 == a2 == a.
/*35*/ assert(a >= 0); // By [02]
/*36*/ assert(a < b); // By [01]
}
// Informally, we can note that we now have the same program state that
// exists at the start of the extended_euclidean_collins() routine, with
// the difference that inputs a and b are swapped, and the x recurrence
// and y recurrence are swapped.
// It seems possible that the rest of this proof might formally
// reference this relationship, resulting in perhaps a short proof.
// But instead, in order to quickly prove the results, I simply will
// replicate the basic logic from the extended_euclidean_collins proof.
// Unfortunately this means the proof will be similarly long.
/*37*/ assert_invariant(b > 0); // By [36, 35]
/*38*/ assert_invariant(gcd(a,b) >= 1);
// Proof: By [37] b > 0, so gcd(a,b) != gcd(0,0). Since 1 is a
// common divisor of both a and b, gcd(a,b) >= 1
/*39*/ assert_invariant(a0 > 0); // By [28, 37]
/*40*/ assert(a1 >= 0); // By [34, 35]
/*41*/ assert_invariant(a1 < a0); // By [34, 28, 36]
/*42*/ assert_invariant(a*x0 + b*y0 == a0);// Proof: By [26, 27, 28],
// a*x0+b*y0 == a*0+b*1 == b== a0
/*43*/ assert_invariant(a*x1 + b*y1 == a1);// Proof: By [32, 33, 34],
// a*x1+b*y1 == a*1+b*0 == a== a1
/*44*/ assert_invariant(gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a,b)); // By [28, 34]
/*45*/ assert_invariant(abs(y0*x1 - x0*y1) == 1); // Proof: By [27,32,26,33]
// abs(y0*x1 - x0*y1) ==
// abs(1*1 - 0*0) == 1
/*46*/ T s0 = 1; // informally, s0 represents the sign of y0.
/*47*/ T s1 = -1; // the sign of y1 (values <= 0 treated as negative)
/*48*/ assert_invariant(s1 == -s0); // By [46, 47]
/*49*/ assert_invariant(abs(s0) == 1); // By [46]
/*50*/ assert_invariant(s0*abs(y0) == y0); // By [27, 46], y0 == 1, s0 == 1.
// s0*abs(y0) == 1*1 == 1 == y0
/*51*/ assert_invariant(s1*abs(y1) == y1); // By [33,47], y1 == 0, s1 == -1.
// s1*abs(y1) == -1*0 == 0 == y1
/*52*/ assert_invariant(-s0*abs(x0) == x0);// By [26, 46], x0 == 0, s0 == 1.
// -s0*abs(x0) == -1*0 == 0 == x0
/*53*/ assert_invariant(-s1*abs(x1) == x1);// By [32,47], x1 == 1, s1 == -1.
// -s1*abs(x1) == 1*1 == 1 == x1
/*54*/ assert(abs(x1) >= 2*abs(x0)); // By [32, 26], x1 == 1, x0 == 0.
// abs(x1) == 1 >= 0 == 2*abs(x0)
/*55*/ assert_invariant(gcd(x1,y1) == 1); // By [32, 33], x1 == 1, y1 == 0.
// gcd(x1,y1) == gcd(1,0) ==
// The remaining iterations of the loop:
/*56*/ while (a1 != 0) {
/*57*/ assert_invariant(a0 > 0); // By [39, M8]
/*58*/ assert(a1 > 0);
// Proof: By [40, M9] a1 >= 0, and by [56] a1 != 0, so a1 > 0.
/*59*/ assert_invariant(a1 < a0); // By [41, N0]
/*60*/ assert_invariant(a*x0 + b*y0 == a0); // By [42, N1]
/*61*/ assert_invariant(a*x1 + b*y1 == a1); // By [43, N2]
/*62*/ assert_invariant(gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a,b)); // By [44, N3]
/*63*/ assert_invariant(abs(y0*x1 - x0*y1) == 1); // By [45, N4]
/*64*/ assert_invariant(s1 == -s0); // By [48, N5]
/*65*/ assert_invariant(abs(s0) == 1); // By [49, N6]
/*66*/ assert_invariant(s0*abs(y0) == y0); // By [50, N7]
/*67*/ assert_invariant(s1*abs(y1) == y1); // By [51, N8]
/*68*/ assert_invariant(-s0*abs(x0) == x0); // By [52, N9]
/*69*/ assert_invariant(-s1*abs(x1) == x1); // By [53, W0]
/*70*/ assert(abs(s1) == 1); // By [64,65] s1== -s0. abs(s1)==abs(s0)== 1
/*71*/ T q = a0/a1;
/*72*/ assert(1 <= q && q <= a0);
// Proof: By [71] q == a0/a1 (note that a1 might not divide a0)
// By [58, 59] a1>0 and a1<a0, so 0 < a1 < a0, and thus,
// q == a0/a1 >= 1.
// Since 0 < a1 implies a1 >= 1, we have q == a0/a1 <= a0.
/*73*/ T a2 = a0 - q*a1;
if (a2 != 0) {
/*74*/ assert(q <= a0 / 2);
// Proof : Assume a1 == 1. Then by [71], q == a0/a1 == a0.
// By [73], a2 == a0 - q*a1, and since q == a0,
// a2 == a0 - a0*a1. Thus, given the assumption a1 == 1,
// a2 == a0 - a0*1 == 0. But a2 == 0 is a contradiction,
// because entering this clause requires a2 != 0. Therefore,
// a1 != 1
// By [58] a1 > 0, and so, since a1 != 1, a1 >= 2
// Since q == a0/a1 and a1 >= 2 and by [57] a0 > 0,
// q <= a0 / 2
}
/*75*/ assert(0 < (q*a1) && (q*a1) <= a0);
// Proof: By [72, 58], q >= 1 and a1 > 0, so q*a1 > 0.
// By [71], q == a0/a1, and by [57, 58], a0 > 0 and a1 > 0.
// Hence by [P3], q*a1 <= a0.
/*76*/ assert(0 <= a2 && a2 < a1);
// Proof: By [57, 58], a0 > 0 and a1 > 0, and by [71] q == a0/a1,
// so by [P1] q satisfies a0 == a1*q + r, with 0 <= r < a1.
// Thus, a0 - q*a1 == r. By [73] a0 - q*a1 == a2, so a2 == r.
// Since 0 <= r < a1, we know 0 <= a2 < a1
/*77*/ assert(gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a1,a2));
// Proof: By definition d = gcd(a0,a1) divides both a0 and a1. So
// since by [73] a2 == a0 - q*a1, d must also divide a2. Thus d
// is a common divisor of a1 and a2, and so d divides gcd(a1,a2).
// Thus gcd(a0,a1) divides gcd(a1,a2).
// Similarly, c = gcd(a1,a2) divides both a1 and a2, and since
// by [73] a0 == a2 + q*a1, c must also divide a0. Thus c is a
// common divisor of a0 and a1, and so c divides gcd(a0,a1). Thus
// gcd(a1,a2) divides gcd(a0,a1). Since both gcd(a0,a1) divides
// gcd(a1,a2), and gcd(a1,a2) divides gcd(a0,a1), we know by [P5],
// gcd(a0,a1) == +- gcd(a1,a2).
// Since gcds are never negative, gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a1,a2).
/*78*/ assert(gcd(a1,a2) == gcd(a,b));
// Proof: By [77] gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a1,a2). And by [62]
// gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a,b). Therefore gcd(a1,a2) == gcd(a,b).
/*79*/ T x2 = x0 - q*x1;
/*80*/ assert(x2 == -s0*(abs(x0) + abs(q*x1)));
// Proof: By [68, 69], x0 == -s0*abs(x0) and x1 == -s1*abs(x1).
// By [79], x2 == x0 - q*x1, so x2 == -s0*abs(x0) + q*s1*abs(x1)
// By [64], s1 == -s0, so x2 == -s0*abs(x0) - q*s0*abs(x1).
// And thus x2 == -s0*(abs(x0) + q*abs(x1)). By [72], q >= 1, so
// x2 == -s0*(abs(x0) + abs(q*x1))
/*81*/ assert(abs(x2) == abs(x0) + abs(q*x1));
// Proof: By [80], x2 == -s0*(abs(x0) + abs(q*x1)), so
// abs(x2) == abs(-s0)*abs(abs(x0) + abs(q*x1))
// abs(x2) == abs(s0)*(abs(x0) + abs(q*x1)
// Since by [65], abs(s0) == 1, abs(x2) == abs(x0) + abs(q*x1).
/*82*/ assert(abs(q*x1) <= abs(x2)); // By [81]
/*83*/ assert(abs(x1) <= abs(x2));
// Proof: By [72], q >= 1, so abs(x1) <= abs(q*x1)
// By [82], abs(q*x1) <= abs(x2), thus
// abs(x1) <= abs(q*x1) <= abs(x2)
/*84*/ T y2 = y0 - q*y1;
/*85*/ assert(y2 == s0*(abs(y0) + abs(q*y1)));
// Proof: By [66, 67], y0 == s0*abs(y0) and y1 == s1*abs(y1).
// By [84], y2 == y0 - q*y1, so y2 == s0*abs(y0) - q*s1*abs(y1)
// By [64], s1 == -s0, so y2 == s0*abs(y0) + q*s0*abs(y1).
// And thus y2 == s0*(abs(y0) + q*abs(y1)). By [72], q >= 1, so
// y2 == s0*(abs(y0) + abs(q*y1))
/*86*/ assert(abs(y2) == abs(y0) + abs(q*y1));
// Proof: By [85], y2 == s0*(abs(y0) + abs(q*y1)), so
// abs(y2) == abs(s0)*abs(abs(y0) + abs(q*y1))
// abs(y2) == abs(s0)*(abs(y0) + abs(q*y1))
// Since by [65], abs(s0) == 1, abs(y2) == abs(y0) + abs(q*y1).
/*87*/ assert(abs(q*y1) <= abs(y2)); // By [86]
/*88*/ assert(abs(y1) <= abs(y2));
// Proof: By [72], q >= 1, so abs(y1) <= abs(q*y1)
// By [87], abs(q*y1) <= abs(y2), thus
// abs(y1) <= abs(q*y1) <= abs(y2)
/*89*/ T s2 = -s1;
/*90*/ assert(s2 == s0); // By [89, 64]
/*91*/ assert(-s2*abs(x2) == x2);
// Proof: By [81], abs(x2) == (abs(x0) + abs(q*x1)).
// By [80], x2 == -s0*(abs(x0) + abs(q*x1)), so x2 == -s0*abs(x2).
// By [90], s2 == s0, thus x2 == -s2*abs(x2).
/*92*/ assert(s2*abs(y2) == y2);
// Proof: By [86], abs(y2) == (abs(y0) + abs(q*y1))
// By [85], y2 == s0*(abs(y0) + abs(q*y1)), so y2 == s0*abs(y2)
// By [90], s2 == s0, thus y2 == s2*abs(y2).
/*93*/ if (a2 == 0) {
/*94*/ assert(q >= 2);
// Proof: By [73], a2 == a0 - q*a1
// Hence by [93], 0 == a0 - q*a1 and a0 == q*a1.
// If we assume q==1, then since we just showed a0 == q*a1,
// we would have a0 == a1, which contradicts [59] a1 < a0.
// Therefore q!=1, and since by [72], q >= 1, we know q >= 2.
/*95*/ assert(abs(x2) >= 2*abs(x1));
// Proof: By [82], abs(x2) >= abs(q*x1). Since by [94] q >= 2,
// abs(x2) >= q*abs(x1) >= 2*abs(x1).
/*96*/ assert(abs(y2) >= 2*abs(y1));
// Proof: By [87], abs(y2) >= abs(q*y1). Since by [94] q >= 2,
// abs(y2) >= q*abs(y1) >= 2*abs(y1).
}
/*97*/ assert((y1*x2 - x1*y2) == -(y0*x1 - x0*y1));
// Proof: Let D0 = y0*x1 - x0*y1 and let D1 = y1*x2 - x1*y2.
// By [79, 84],
// D1 == y1*(x0 - q*x1) - x1*(y0 - q*y1)
// D1 == y1*x0 - x1*q*y1 - x1*y0 + x1*q*y1
// D1 == y1*x0 - x1*y0
// D1 == -D0
/*98*/ assert(abs(y1*x2 - x1*y2) == 1);
// Proof: By [63], abs(y0*x1 - x0*y1) == 1
// By [97], (y1*x2 - x1*y2) == -(y0*x1 - x0*y1)
// Thus, abs(y1*x2 - x1*y2) == abs(y0*x1 - x0*y1) == 1
/*99*/ assert(a*x2 + b*y2 == a2);
// Proof: By [73], a2 == a0 - q*a1
// and thus by [60, 61],
// a2 == a*x0 + b*y0 - q*(a*x1 + b*y1)
// a2 == a*x0 - q*a*x1 + b*y0 - q*b*y1
// a2 == a*(x0 - q*x1) + b*(y0 - q*y1)
// and by [79, 84],
// a2 == a*x2 + b*y2
/*M0*/ x0 = x1;
/*M1*/ y0 = y1;
/*M2*/ a0 = a1;
/*M3*/ x1 = x2;
/*M4*/ y1 = y2;
/*M5*/ a1 = a2;
/*M6*/ s0 = s1;
/*M7*/ s1 = s2;
// trivially, we know at this point
/*M8*/ assert_invariant(a0 > 0); // By [58, M2]
/*M9*/ assert(a1 >= 0); // By [76, M5]
/*N0*/ assert_invariant(a1 < a0); // By [76, M2, M5]
/*N1*/ assert_invariant(a*x0 + b*y0 == a0); // By [61, M0, M1, M2]
/*N2*/ assert_invariant(a*x1 + b*y1 == a1); // By [99, M3, M4, M5]
/*N3*/ assert_invariant(gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a,b)); // By [78, M2, M5]
/*N4*/ assert_invariant(abs(y0*x1 - x0*y1) == 1); // By [98,M1,M3,M0,M4]
/*N5*/ assert_invariant(s1 == -s0); // By [89, M7, M6]
/*N6*/ assert_invariant(abs(s0) == 1); // By [70, M6]
/*N7*/ assert_invariant(s0*abs(y0) == y0); // By [67, M6, M1]
/*N8*/ assert_invariant(s1*abs(y1) == y1); // By [92, M7, M4]
/*N9*/ assert_invariant(-s0*abs(x0) == x0); // By [69, M6, M0]
/*W0*/ assert_invariant(-s1*abs(x1) == x1); // By [91, M7, M3]
/*W1*/ assert(abs(x1) >= abs(x0)); // By [83, M3, M0]
/*W2*/ assert(abs(y1) >= abs(y0)); // By [88, M4, M1]
/*W3*/ if (a1 == 0) {
/*W4*/ assert(abs(x1) >= 2*abs(x0)); // By [93, 95, M5, M3, M0]
/*W5*/ assert(abs(y1) >= 2*abs(y0)); // By [93, 96, M5, M4, M1]
}
// Less trivially,
/*W6*/ assert_invariant(gcd(x1, y1) == 1);
// Proof: By [N4] y0*x1 - x0*y1 == +-1, so there obviously
// exist integers u and v such that u*x1 + v*y1 == 1.
// Let d be any common divisor of x1 and y1 (we know a common
// divisor exists since 1 divides x1 and y1). Since d divides
// both x1 and y1, d divides u*x1 + v*y1 == 1, and thus
// d divides 1. Since d divides 1, d == +-1. Thus a common
// divisor of x1 and y1 can only be -1 or 1, and since 1 is a
// common divisor of x1 and y1, the greatest common divisor of x1
// and y1 is 1. For a similar proof see
// http://people.sju.edu/~pklingsb/rp.fta.pdf
}
/*W7*/ assert(a1 == 0);
// Since we finished the loop, we know a1 == 0 at this point.
/*W8*/ assert(x1*(a/gcd(a,b)) == -y1*(b/gcd(a,b)));
// Proof: By [43,N2], a*x1 + b*y1 == a1, and so by [W7]
// a*x1 + b*y1 == 0
// x1*a == -y1*b
// Letting d = gcd(a,b), by [38] d >= 1. Since d divides a and b,
// and x1*a == -y1*b, we know x1*(a/d) == -y1*(b/d)
/*W9*/ assert(gcd(a/gcd(a,b), b/gcd(a,b)) == 1);
// Proof: Letting d=gcd(a,b), by [38] d >= 1. Since d contains all
// the common divisors of a and b, d divides both a and b, and the
// quotients of a/d and b/d have no common divisors except 1 and -1.
// Therefore gcd(a/d, b/d) == 1.
/*Z0*/ assert(abs(x1) == b/gcd(a,b));
// Proof: Letting d = gcd(a,b), by [W8] x1*(a/d) == -y1*(b/d).
// By [W9] (a/d) and (b/d) are coprime, and by [55,W6] x1 and -y1 are
// coprime. So by [P6], abs(a/d)==abs(-y1) and abs(x1)==abs(b/d).
// By [38,37], d>0 and b>0, so abs(b/d) == b/d.
// Thus, abs(x1) == abs(b/d) == b/d
/*Z1*/ assert(abs(y1) == a/gcd(a,b));
// Proof: Letting d = gcd(a,b), by [W8] x1*(a/d) == -y1*(b/d).
// By [W9] (a/d) and (b/d) are coprime, and by [55,W6] x1 and -y1 are
// coprime. So by [P6], abs(a/d)==abs(-y1) and abs(x1)==abs(b/d).
// By [38,35], d>0 and a>=0, so abs(a/d) == a/d.
// Thus, abs(y1) == abs(-y1) == abs(a/d) == a/d
/*Z2*/ assert((y0 == 1 && y1 == 0) || (abs(y1) >= 2*abs(y0)));
// Proof: By [27, 33, W3, W5, W7]
/*Z3*/ assert(abs(x1) >= 2*abs(x0)); // By [54, W3, W4, W7]
/*Z4*/ assert(y0 == 1 || abs(y0) <= (a/gcd(a,b))/2);
// Proof: By [Z2], (y0 == 1 && y1 == 0) || (abs(y1) >= 2*abs(y0)),
// Assume (y0 == 1 && y1 == 0). Then we would have y0 == 1.
// Assume instead (abs(y1) >= 2*abs(y0)). By [Z1],
// abs(y1) == a/gcd(a,b). Thus we would have
// a/gcd(a,b) == abs(y1) >= 2*abs(y0). Letting d = gcd(a,b), we
// would have abs(y0)*2 <= a/d. By [35,38] a >= 0 and d > 0, so
// (a/d) >= 0. Since (a/d) >= 0 and 2 > 0 and abs(y0)*2 <= (a/d),
// by [P2] we would have abs(y0) <= (a/d)/2.
// Thus y0 == 1, or abs(y0) <= (a/d)/2.
/*Z5*/ assert(abs(x0) <= (b/gcd(a,b))/2);
// Proof: By [Z3], abs(x1) >= 2*abs(x0), and by [Z0],
// abs(x1) == b/gcd(a,b). Thus, b/gcd(a,b) == abs(x1) >= 2*abs(x0).
// Letting d = gcd(a,b), abs(x0)*2 <= b/d. By [37, 38] b > 0 and
// d > 0, so (b/d) >= 0. Since (b/d) >= 0 and 2 > 0 and
// abs(x0)*2 <= (b/d), by [P2] abs(x0) <= (b/d)/2.
/*Z6*/ assert(a0 == gcd(a,b));
// Proof: By [W7] a1 == 0, and by [39,M8] a0 > 0, so
// gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a0,0) == a0.
// By [44,N3] gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a,b). Therefore,
// a0 == gcd(a0,a1) == gcd(a,b)
/*Z7*/ assert(a*x0 + b*y0 == gcd(a,b));
// By [42,N1] a*x0 + b*y0 == a0, and so by [Z6],
// a*x0 + b*y0 == a0 == gcd(a,b)
// Note: Since a*x0 + b*y0 == gcd(a,b), we know x0 and y0 are the
// Bezout coefficients.
*pX = x0;
*pY = y0;
*pGcd = a0;
}
#undef assert_invariant
#undef assert_precondition
#endif