You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
Thanks for your great work. Have you ever encountered training failure due to the scale difference between the offset and the canonical space gs?
For example, the position range of the canonical space gs is [-0.2, 0.2], while the offset range output by the deformation model is [-1, 1]. So most of the gs will be deformed out of the camera's field of view, causing a large difference between the rendered image and the ground truth, making it impossible for the model to optimize properly.
Do you have any opinion on this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thanks for your great work. Have you ever encountered training failure due to the scale difference between the offset and the canonical space gs?
For example, the position range of the canonical space gs is [-0.2, 0.2], while the offset range output by the deformation model is [-1, 1]. So most of the gs will be deformed out of the camera's field of view, causing a large difference between the rendered image and the ground truth, making it impossible for the model to optimize properly.
Do you have any opinion on this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: