Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EN translation for tetris chips #17

Open
SleeperSmith opened this issue Apr 6, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

EN translation for tetris chips #17

SleeperSmith opened this issue Apr 6, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@SleeperSmith
Copy link

Hi Guys,

Was explaining this for the en gf official discord so I thought I'd dump it here

1. select HOC type
If you tick the check box, M2 combinations will NOT use second group of 5 block chips. However, it'll cause 1 to 3 empty spaces.
2. set output
all combinations: Output all combinations possible from the displayed image.
Prioritised combinations: Output the most optimal combinations for selected stats combinations
3. Stats prioritisation.
Select: mixed total stats, lethality, pierce, accuracy, reload.
4. Filter settings
Tick the corresponding stats for which you want to filter the maximum overflow of stats cap and block.
The button is for sake of convenience and activates/deactivates the value cap (left) and block cap (right)

Example 1
BGM-71 has a stats cap of 190 lethality, 329 pierce cap.
The image sets a stats OVERFLOW cap of 10 lethality and 5 pierce.
Therefore, it will not output any combination with lethality > 200 OR pierce > 334.

Example 2
2B-14 has a reload stats cap of 85, and it correspondingly has a block cap of 6.
2B-14 has a reload block cap of 8. The image ticks a block cap of -2. Therefore, it will not display any combinations with stats block count > 6.

That's a relatively precise (almost sentence to sentence, but worded with grammar as correct as I can manage) translation of:
https://github.com/hycdes/GFTool/blob/master/img/chip/tutorial/cc-2-cn.png

@SleeperSmith
Copy link
Author

Oh, and thanks for the tool. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant