Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Baseline performance on CAVIAR #4

Open
ForeUP opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Baseline performance on CAVIAR #4

ForeUP opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ForeUP
Copy link

ForeUP commented Aug 17, 2023

Thank you for your excellent work.

I am interested in knowing how you produced the results using the Baseline model on CAVIAR.

Looking forward to your response!

@Yukun-Huang
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for your attention! The CAVIAR and MLR-VIPeR datasets are too small to get reliable results. Using fewer iteration steps (e.g., 1/3 of the original number of steps) may avoid overfitting and improve performance.

@ForeUP
Copy link
Author

ForeUP commented Aug 23, 2023

I tested it every epoch during training, and the best results I obtained were:

2023-08-19 23:45:27,157 reid_baseline.train INFO: ----------
2023-08-19 23:45:28,445 reid_baseline.train INFO: Validation Results - Epoch: 30
2023-08-19 23:45:28,445 reid_baseline.train INFO: mAP: 35.7%
2023-08-19 23:45:28,445 reid_baseline.train INFO: CMC curve, Rank-1 :42.8%
2023-08-19 23:45:28,446 reid_baseline.train INFO: CMC curve, Rank-5 :66.4%
2023-08-19 23:45:28,446 reid_baseline.train INFO: CMC curve, Rank-10 :78.4%

Could you please provide more details or share the weights file along with the dataset source file?
Thank you very much for your response!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants