Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow side loading alternate inbound transports #322

Merged

Conversation

dbluhm
Copy link
Member

@dbluhm dbluhm commented Jan 7, 2020

I ran into a use case where there was a need to run both the "http" and "ws" transport on the same port. I wasn't sure a transport that combined both of these into one "http+ws" transport was something that was wanted upstream (if it is, I'm happy to address that separately) but I noticed that a couple of small tweaks would make it easy enough to side load my combined transport.

I'm curious how others feel about this approach.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Bluhm <daniel.bluhm@sovrin.org>
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 7, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #322 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 75%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #322      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.36%   87.36%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         236      236              
  Lines       11074    11078       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         9675     9678       +3     
- Misses       1399     1400       +1

dbluhm and others added 2 commits January 15, 2020 10:35
@andrewwhitehead andrewwhitehead merged commit 223e1e6 into hyperledger:master Jan 15, 2020
@dbluhm dbluhm deleted the alternate-transport-loading branch February 21, 2020 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants