fix(cmd-api-server): enable version selection in plugins

[elenaizaguirre]

cactus-cmd-api-server can now import plugins specifying
the npm package version as a plugin option

cmd-api-server: add missing dependency bluebird

closes #839 and #840

Signed-off-by: Elena Izaguirre e.izaguirre.equiza@accenture.com

[elenaizaguirre]

@petermetz Finally I added bluebird dependency in this PR instead of the Quorum one because I thought it was better join cmd-api-server changes

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1390 (cbe857f) into main (9c7bab5) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1390      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.34%   71.33%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         308      308              
  Lines       11262    11264       +2     
  Branches     1382     1383       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         8035     8035              
- Misses       2473     2475       +2     
  Partials      754      754              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...s-cmd-api-server/src/main/typescript/api-server.ts	86.28% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
...main/typescript/rustc-container/rustc-container.ts	66.29% <0.00%> (-2.25%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9c7bab5...cbe857f. Read the comment docs.

[petermetz]

@elenaizaguirre Reminder to hit 're-request review' when you want it to be reviewed again.
Marking the comments as 'resolved' doesn't do the same (I agree that it probably should though)

[elenaizaguirre]

@elenaizaguirre Reminder to hit 're-request review' when you want it to be reviewed again. Marking the comments as 'resolved' doesn't do the same (I agree that it probably should though)

I'll keep it in mind!

[elenaizaguirre]

@petermetz This PR closes two issues but only one of them is closed now. Should I change the way to reference them?

[petermetz]

@elenaizaguirre I think the second one you'll have to close manually now that the PR has been merged in the meantime.
For the future: Yes please, however many issues are being closed by a PR, link all of them to it, it's fine if sometimes we accidentally open issues that end up being duplicates like that.