feat(connector-besu): contract deployment with constructor arguments #824
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
🎉 Great news! Looks like all the dependencies have been resolved: 💡 To add or remove a dependency please update this issue/PR description. Brought to you by Dependent Issues (:robot: ). Happy coding! |
takeutak
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2021
kikoncuo
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2021
Previously you couldn't deploy a contract that had constructor arguments of it's own because there was no way to pass in these. With this improvement this is now possible. Depends on hyperledger#810 Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
petermetz
force-pushed
the
feat-besu-contract-deploy-with-ctor-args
branch
from
dbdab88
to
ce47794
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously you couldn't deploy a contract that had constructor arguments
of it's own because there was no way to pass in these.
With this improvement this is now possible.
Depends on #810
Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari peter.somogyvari@accenture.com
cc: @jordigiam @AzaharaC