Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FAB-18171] Disregard certificate validity period in intra-orderer communication #1825

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2020

Conversation

yacovm
Copy link
Contributor

@yacovm yacovm commented Aug 28, 2020

This change set makes the orderer cluster authentication infrastructure
disregard validity periods when comparing certificates, and only regard public keys.

With this change, one can replace the TLS certificate of Raft,
by a certificate that has the same public key without issuing channel config updates.

This is to ensure that if a certificate of a consenter expired,
one can quickly renew it and start the orderer without performing
a config update per channel.

Change-Id: Id1b29e220d37aa33617b2143b702075bf5b01f6f
Signed-off-by: yacovm yacovm@il.ibm.com

@yacovm yacovm requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2020 22:27
…mmunication

This change set makes the orderer cluster authentication infrastructure
disregard validity periods when comparing certificates, and only regard public keys.

With this change, one can replace the TLS certificate of Raft,
by a certificate that has the same public key without issuing channel config updates.

This is to ensure that if a certificate of a consenter expired,
one can quickly renew it and start the orderer without performing
a config update per channel.

Change-Id: Id1b29e220d37aa33617b2143b702075bf5b01f6f
Signed-off-by: yacovm <yacovm@il.ibm.com>
@jyellick jyellick merged commit 9848841 into hyperledger:release-1.4 Sep 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants