Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add local stack examples #939

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

patlo-iog
Copy link
Contributor

@patlo-iog patlo-iog commented Mar 20, 2024

Description:

Open for feedback. Experiment with local examples with generated docker configurations.

https://nickel-lang.org/ is used to generate all compose.yaml in each example.

example description
st single-tenant configuration without external services (except database)
st-multi 3 instances of single-tenant configuration
st-vault single-tenant with Vault for secret storage
mt multi-tenant configuration using built-in IAM
mt-keycloak multi-tenant configuration using Keycloak for IAM
mt-keycloak-vault multi-tenant configuration using Keycloak and Vault

Example we might consider in the future

  • vault with file storage
  • vault with AppRole authentication
  • keycloak with agent admin role
  • oidc4vc configuration
  • overriding config with application.conf
  • production?

Checklist:

  • My PR follows the contribution guidelines of this project
  • My PR is free of third-party dependencies that don't comply with the Allowlist
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked the PR title to follow the conventional commit specification

@patlo-iog patlo-iog marked this pull request as draft March 20, 2024 14:27
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2024

Integration Test Results

13 files  ±0  13 suites  ±0   2s ⏱️ ±0s
29 tests ±0  29 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
32 runs  ±0  32 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 458d0ce. ± Comparison against base commit 16bc10d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 20, 2024

Unit Test Results

 90 files  ±0   90 suites  ±0   21m 9s ⏱️ -28s
776 tests ±0  768 ✅ ±0  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
783 runs  ±0  775 ✅ ±0  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 458d0ce. ± Comparison against base commit 16bc10d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@patlo-iog patlo-iog marked this pull request as ready for review April 1, 2024 07:36
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants