Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How much effort would support for Mercurial be? #7

Closed
photex opened this issue Jul 23, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

How much effort would support for Mercurial be? #7

photex opened this issue Jul 23, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@photex
Copy link

photex commented Jul 23, 2014

Hello,

There is at least one interesting project I'd like to create a CPM module for. Unfortunately the project uses Hg.
https://bitbucket.org/tunnuz/json/overview

I would love to see CPM become the tool of choice for c++ libraries to make themselves available to a wider audience. This might be one step to making that happen. Projects in general are starting to use CMake more frequently which is a good path as well.

Anyway, before I just create a git mirror of that repo I thought I'd get a feel for the work involved in supporting mercurial in CPM instead.

Cheers,

Chip

@photex
Copy link
Author

photex commented Jul 24, 2014

I just learned about the ExternalProject support in Cmake. CPM works a bit differently of course, but maybe the path forward to actually wrap that instead?

@iauns
Copy link
Owner

iauns commented Jul 24, 2014

Hey Photex. @toeb actually added mercurial support already, I just haven't documented it (I really should do that!)

Here's the link to the pull request and subsequent resolution: #6 . Let me know if you have any issues and I'll update the documentation tomorrow.

@photex
Copy link
Author

photex commented Jul 24, 2014

Zing! Thanks @iauns

@iauns iauns closed this as completed Nov 17, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants