Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NotCheckpointSafe annotations to PhantomCleanable #750

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

singh264
Copy link
Contributor

Add NotCheckpointSafe annotations to PhantomCleanable to
avoid blocking operations during restore in CRIU single
thread mode, and fix the failures in the
cmdLineTester_criu_nonPortableRestore tests that occur due
to blocking operations during restore in CRIU single
thread mode.

Issue: eclipse-openj9/openj9#18749
Signed-off-by: Amarpreet Singh Amarpreet.A.Singh@ibm.com

Add NotCheckpointSafe annotations to PhantomCleanable to
avoid blocking operations during restore in CRIU single
thread mode, and fix the failures in the
cmdLineTester_criu_nonPortableRestore tests that occur due
to blocking operations during restore in CRIU single
thread mode.

Issue: eclipse-openj9/openj9#18749
Signed-off-by: Amarpreet Singh <Amarpreet.A.Singh@ibm.com>
@singh264
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tajila requesting your review.

@singh264 singh264 marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2024 20:51
@TobiAjila
Copy link

@JasonFengJ9 please review/merge

@JasonFengJ9
Copy link
Member

jenkins test sanity xmac,alinux64 jdk11

@JasonFengJ9 JasonFengJ9 merged commit a79d3c7 into ibmruntimes:openj9 Jan 15, 2024
7 checks passed
@keithc-ca
Copy link
Member

This should not have been merged until after equivalent changes have been applied to later versions (jdk17, jdk21, jdk22, jdknext). @singh264 Please prepare changes for those versions.

@JasonFengJ9
Copy link
Member

JasonFengJ9 commented Jan 15, 2024

@keithc-ca those equivalent changes were merged a while ago, this is the Java level not applied initially.

eclipse-openj9/openj9#18749 (comment)

@keithc-ca
Copy link
Member

I see that now. Sorry for the interruption.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants