-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue1059 control io no socket #1170
Conversation
…NoSocket issue1059_controlIONoSocket
…NoSocket issue1059_controlIONoSocket - Removed energy signals
…NoSocket Updated signal types
…NoSocket Merge latest master.
FYI @JavierArroyoBastida, I've made this PR and asked for a review by @mwetter . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dhblum : This is in my view fine to merge. I reviewed all code and documentation and made changes to the documentation where needed. I also added info for all package.mo
files.
Note the change in 35ccf6e in which I changed the parameter name to lower case for consistency (instance names are typically lower case). This probably has side effects in downstream tools. I am not sure how disruptive this will be.
If you agree, please ask @PMehrfeld for a review so that we have a non-LBL and non-KU Leuven person reviewing it before it can be merged.
@mwetter Thank you for completing your review. I agree with all of your suggestions, except made one correction to revision documentation, which I've fixed in efd933f. The change in parameter name to lower case is noted. It will affect downstream tools, but should be fixed easily. I've already added it as a to-do in the BOTEST repo at ibpsa/project1-boptest#49. |
Thanks @dhblum . |
@PMehrfeld : can you please review and merge if you agree with the implementation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mwetter : Sorry, I must have overlooked this review request unintentionally!
For #1059.