You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some sites produce unwanted effects (see screenshots) while rendering
text-shadow in chrome 17 (don’t know, maybe the effect persists in newer
chrome versions) see screenshots mactype01.png (soundcloud widget),
mactype02.png (zvooq.ru)
i’m using win2008 server r2
Also (in fact not an issue but asking for help), though I like the rendering of
mactype (especially all the possibilities for tweaking various font
properties), but still the picture provided by gdipp feels better to me. (see
screenshots: mactype03.png—mactype, mactype04.png—gdipp). just wanted to
now whether i am just stupid and there exists an ini file for mactype that
would produce a picture exactly like the latter.
Thanks in advance!
Original issue reported on code.google.com by pechyo...@gmail.com on 17 Apr 2012 at 5:15
for picture 1 and 2, it will be appreciate if you can provide website url or
the name of software.
for pic 3&4, I have to say that mactype will never be work like gdipp did.
MacType has a very different render conception from gdipp that mactype always
place letters as windows GDI did, we are looking for accurate GDI simulation
because this will make mactype extraordinarily compatible with apps, and it
won't broke the WYSIWYG of Microsoft Office products.
While on the other hand, gdipp rearranges characters using its own algorithm,
which makes text rendering feels better but also become incompatible with lots
of apps.
Original comment by flyingsn...@gmail.com on 18 Apr 2012 at 12:45
Thank you for the answer!
Picture 1 is Soundcloud.com widget, appearing on many sites (particularly this
one cam be seen on http://paperpaper.ru/jack_white/)
i figured out that the very css rule causing a mess is this one: {text-shadow:
rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.898438) 0px 1px 0px;
body - 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,0.9) }
Picture 2 is zvooq.ru site, you can’t get there and view pages without some
registration mess, but I think you needn’t as the problem is just the same.
Original comment by pechyo...@gmail.com on 18 Apr 2012 at 3:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pechyo...@gmail.com
on 17 Apr 2012 at 5:15Attachments:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: