New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ben's AD review comments #52
Conversation
The original text was superceded since written and was thus very badly wrong.
A team with administrator access SHOULD be created for the Working Group Chairs | ||
and any Working Group Secretary. Administrator access is preferable, since this | ||
does not also include the ability to push to all repositories and ownership does | ||
not grant any other significant privileges. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can understand that there's not a huge need to mention the details of Administrator privilege in these guidelines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, the point was that this was flat wrong, based on an outdated authorization model.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we mention that the model (as is now documented) is also subject to change?
Co-Authored-By: kaduk <kaduk-github@mit.edu>
Co-Authored-By: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Based on Rob's review feedback, but adding it here to avoid conflicts.
No description provided.