You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The nuances of connectionless protocols also are discussed in
sec. 4.4.1 para. 1 and the part of the paragraph discussed above. It
may be an improvement to gather all that information into this
section.
Also, these considerations apply to any handshake-less protocol.
E.g. there probably is no guarantee that a server will accept another
stream on a multiplexed connection. So it may be worth introducing
the class "handshake-less protocol" explicitly.
To mitigate this, an
application can use a Message Framer (Section 6) on top of a
connectionless protocol to only mark a specific connection attempt as
ready when some data has been received, or after some application-
level handshake has been performed.
Of course, a Message Framer is just another protocol layered on top.
In this instance, the point is that it presents to the application a
protocol with handshake but it uses a protocol without a handshake.
You might want to state that explicitly.
4.6. Handling connectionless protocols
The nuances of connectionless protocols also are discussed in
sec. 4.4.1 para. 1 and the part of the paragraph discussed above. It
may be an improvement to gather all that information into this
section.
Also, these considerations apply to any handshake-less protocol.
E.g. there probably is no guarantee that a server will accept another
stream on a multiplexed connection. So it may be worth introducing
the class "handshake-less protocol" explicitly.
To mitigate this, an
application can use a Message Framer (Section 6) on top of a
connectionless protocol to only mark a specific connection attempt as
ready when some data has been received, or after some application-
level handshake has been performed.
Of course, a Message Framer is just another protocol layered on top.
In this instance, the point is that it presents to the application a
protocol with handshake but it uses a protocol without a handshake.
You might want to state that explicitly.
From the review by Dale Worley: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/bpBk8QxZMLksr3ZuROtf2_BXYdI/
Note that indentation was lost by copy+pasting here - look at the edited version or the version at the URL to get a clearer view of what is being quoted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: