Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Registry for "interface instance or type" (from Kyle Rose's review) #523

Closed
mwelzl opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Registry for "interface instance or type" (from Kyle Rose's review) #523

mwelzl opened this issue Apr 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
API ready for text

Comments

@mwelzl
Copy link
Contributor

mwelzl commented Apr 2, 2020

from Kyle:

These type symbols really deserve an actual registry, or at least the start of one. Otherwise, we are likely to end up with a mess.

Philipp Tiesel:

There is already one, but that one was not useful for our matters.
@mwelzl mwelzl added the API label Apr 2, 2020
@squarooticus
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm not sure what Philipp's response means. Where is this registry, and why was it not useful?

@mwelzl mwelzl added the discuss label Apr 17, 2020
@csperkins
Copy link
Contributor

Kyle Rose's review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/o1ehdiAwdqAG42xy2Gy5Cb62eYA/

@tfpauly
Copy link
Contributor

tfpauly commented Apr 17, 2020

This will be system/implementation specific in general, I'd say.

@tfpauly
Copy link
Contributor

tfpauly commented Apr 17, 2020

Add a sentence to 5.2.10 to indicate that this is implementation specific

@tfpauly
Copy link
Contributor

tfpauly commented Apr 17, 2020

Mention that these should be documented?

@gorryfair gorryfair mentioned this issue Apr 17, 2020
Closed
tfpauly added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2020
@tfpauly
Merge pull request #570 from ietf-tapswg/no-interface-type-registry-523
a8f4a87 
clarify that taps interface types are implementation specific, fix #523
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
API ready for text
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@tfpauly @csperkins @squarooticus @mwelzl