Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change example of Specialized Feature to multipath, fixes #363 #388

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 29, 2019

Conversation

theri
Copy link
Contributor

@theri theri commented Nov 29, 2019

Changed example of a Specialized Feature (non-minset) from "encryption" to "automatic handover or failover", as suggested by Anna in #363.
If anyone has an alternative suggestion how to word this, I'm open.

Ideas for alternative solutions include:

  • Go back to the "encryption" example, but do not make "encryption" sound like a generic feature but rather talk about specific security protocols, e.g.: "For example, if an application requires encryption of its transport data, it could select a specific security protocol. In this case, only protocol stacks that include this security protocol are eligible to be used."
  • Find a different example
  • Give up and throw out the example entirely, maybe even changing what a "specialized feature" is

Looking for guidance from the authors here :)

@britram britram merged commit c623830 into master Nov 29, 2019
@britram britram deleted the specialized-features-example branch September 11, 2020 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants