New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attestation Examples added #167
Conversation
draft-ietf-teep-architecture.md
Outdated
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ of extended claims. | |||
|
|||
As of the writing of this specification, device and TEE attestations have not been standardized | |||
across the market. Different devices, manufacturers, and TEEs support different attestation | |||
algorithms and mechanisms. In order for TEEP to be inclusive, it is agnostic to the format of evidence, | |||
algorithms and mechanisms (for example, ECDSA-based attestation, Direct Anonymous Attestation (DAA), Enhanced Privacy ID (EPID), a Privacy CA). In order for TEEP to be inclusive, it is agnostic to the format of evidence, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we would need informative references for each of these, to accept this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about this again and came to the conclusion that this document is not the right place to discuss attestation techniques.
No description provided.