New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more description to status-change last calls #1069
Comments
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed priority from |
@jmh@joelhalpern.com changed status from |
@jmh@joelhalpern.com changed owner from `` to |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Fixed in bb539aa |
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed status from |
@henrik@levkowetz.com changed resolution from `` to |
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Fixed in 28bc1d2: Merged bb539aa from jmh@joelhalpern.com: |
keyword_easy
keyword_sprint
owner:jmh@joelhalpern.com
resolution_fixed
type_defect
| by rjsparks@nostrum.comAdding at least the title of the RFC(s) that are proposed to change would make it easier for people to decide whether to follow up on the Last Call.
See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss/current/msg03441.html
Issue migrated from trac:1069 at 2022-03-04 02:52:44 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: