"Candidate for working group adoption" as the first state! #1406
Labels
Milestone
Comments
|
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed priority from |
|
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed keywords from `` to |
|
@tim.wicinski@teamaol.com commented After looking at the code, I wonder if the better way to approach this is to have a 'candidate for WG adoption' button. |
|
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed status from |
|
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed resolution from `` to |
|
@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented Fixed in 696e932: Allow chosing the initial state when beginning WG processing of a draft. Fixes bug #1406. Commit ready for merge. |
|
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Fixed in 0f4ae8f: Merged in 696e932 from rjsparks@nostrum.com:\n Allow chosing the initial state when beginning WG processing of a draft. Fixes bug #1406. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
keyword_sprintresolution_fixedtype_enhancement| by loa@pi.nuToday a wg groups have procedures that is followed before the actual poll for working group adoption is started, for example we let working group review teams do reviews to help the chairs to see if a document is ready, and we do IPR polls. "Candidate for wg Adoption" were created for this purpose, however to today when working groups starts working on a document it is forced into "Call for adoption by working issued", which in many cases are not true and since it causes traffic to the wg mailing list and the authors, we also spread misinformation that we need to correct with further mails.
When we press the "Adopt in WG" button we should have the opportunity to decided which state document should go into - e.g. "Candidate for working group adoption" if that is what we want to do.
Issue migrated from trac:1406 at 2022-03-04 03:44:29 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: