You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a line on the template that assumes any completed review will have populated the reviewed version field. There are some 2000+ 'completed' ReviewRequest objects in the database for which this is not true.
The mismatched assumption is at line 72
Error during template rendering
In template /Users/rjsparks/ietf/datatracker/rjs/6.39.1.dev0/ietf/templates/group/manage_review_requests.html, error at line 72
Reverse for 'doc_view' with arguments '()' and keyword arguments '{u'rev': u'', u'name': u'draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch'}' not found. 1 pattern(s) tried: ['doc/(?P<name>[A-Za-z0-9._+-]+)/(?:(?P<rev>[0-9-]+)/)?$']
62 <p>
63 {% if r.pk != None %}Requested: <a href="{% url "ietf.doc.views_review.review_request" name=r.doc.name request_id=r.pk %}">[ r.time|date:"Y-m-d" ]</a>
64 {% else %}
65 Auto-suggested
66 {% endif %}
67 </p>
68
69 {% if r.latest_reqs %}
70 {% for rlatest in r.latest_reqs %}
71 <div>
72 Revious review of <a href="{% url "doc_view" name=rlatest.doc_id rev=rlatest.reviewed_rev %}?include_text=1">{% if rlatest.doc_id != r.doc_id %}[ rlatest.doc_id ]{% endif %}-[ rlatest.reviewed_rev ]</a>
73 (<a href="[ rfcdiff_base_url ]?url1=[ rlatest.doc.name ]-[ rlatest.reviewed_rev ]&url2=[ r.doc.name ]-[ r.doc.rev ]">diff</a>):
74 <a href="{% url "ietf.doc.views_review.review_request" name=rlatest.doc_id request_id=rlatest.pk %}">{% if rlatest.result %}[ rlatest.result.name ]{% else %}result unavail.{% endif %}</a>
75 by [ rlatest.reviewer.person ]{% if rlatest.closed_review_request_event %} [ rlatest.closed_review_request_event.time.date|date ]{% endif %}
76 </div>
77 {% endfor %}
78 {% endif %}
79 </div>
80
81 <div><strong>[ r.doc.title ]</strong></div>
82
Issue migrated from trac:2086 at 2022-03-04 05:35:22 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
resolution_fixed
type_defect
| by rjsparks@nostrum.comThere is a line on the template that assumes any completed review will have populated the reviewed version field. There are some 2000+ 'completed' ReviewRequest objects in the database for which this is not true.
The mismatched assumption is at line 72
Issue migrated from trac:2086 at 2022-03-04 05:35:22 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: