New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regression: tools->datatracker: no access to drafts XML from datatracker #3308
Comments
@krathnayake@ietf.org commented This is because datatracker looks at the path defined in I assume fix for this issue and #3309 is using NOTE: pdf (only if file is not found in the |
@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented The right thing to do is always use INTERNET_DRAFT_ARCHIVE_DIR for this view - the current versions of the draft are already in the archive. The view will do the right thing when looking at older versions as well. |
@krathnayake@ietf.org changed status from |
@krathnayake@ietf.org set owner to |
@krathnayake@ietf.org changed status from |
@krathnayake@ietf.org set resolution to |
@krathnayake@ietf.org commented Fixed in 6b9f088: Use INTERNET_ALL_DRAFTS_ARCHIVE_DIR serve all IDs. Fixes #3308 and #3309. Commit ready for merge. |
@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented Fixed in 688f938: Merged in 6b9f088 from krathnayake@ietf.org: |
keyword_regression
owner:krathnayake@ietf.org
resolution_fixed
type_defect
| by tte+anima@cs.fau.deDatatracker does not provide access to the XML version of drafts once they have become RFC. This may have never ben the case, but it was provided for on tools.ietf.org, so users could easily access XML of drafts via their tools.ietf.org web page. Since this year, those URLs redirect to datatracker, where this is not possible anymore.
Example:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane/27/
There is no link to the XML of this document to be found on this page. Nevertheless, it does of course exist:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-27.xml
Note that this problem only applies to documents that have turned RFC. Before they are RFC, dataracker correctly shows the XML links, e.g.:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
The html'ized renderings of RFC since the new RFC formatting are missing hotlinks from the section numbers in the TOC to the sections. The tags for those missing hotlinks still exist, and the section titles still use them.
Example:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8994
Table of Contents
1. Introduction (Informative)
^^ No hotlink
Compare to older RFC:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7994
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .................................2
^^ Hotlink
These hotlinks would be the only option to navigate from TOC to a section in question.
Issue migrated from trac:3308 at 2022-03-04 08:43:11 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: