New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove a manual editing step from the secretariats workflow on sending a 5742 response #812
Labels
Comments
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed status from |
@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed resolution from `` to |
@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented Fixed in 798e7a5:
|
@henrik@levkowetz.com commented Fixed in 798f769: Merged 798e7a5 from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
|
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
keyword_sprint
resolution_fixed
type_enhancement
| by rjsparks@nostrum.comCurrently, when the datatracker generates the email message to send to the ISE or IRTF in response to an RFC5742 review, it includes the sentence:
"The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker ([ doc_url ]) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log."
The secretariat manually removes whichever of the IRSG or RFC-Editor the message is not going to before sending the message.
This template already knows who the message is going to (it uses that to populate the To header field). It should build that sentence such that the secretariat does not have to edit it.
Issue migrated from trac:812 at 2022-03-04 02:30:23 +0000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: