New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a normative section about Tag level emptying #770
Conversation
tags-precedence.md
Outdated
doesn't apply to a level but the actual value to use is not known, | ||
an empty `TagString` ((#tagstring-element)) or an empty `TagBinary` ((#tagbinary-element)) element **MUST** be used as the tag value for this level. | ||
|
||
See [@?MatroskaTags] for more details on common tags values. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't "common tags values" wrong here? If you think about the Matroska tagging system as a listed of key/value pairs, the "value of a tag" is e.g. "Mozart", not "COMPOSER". I guess you're trying to refer to the common values of the TagString
element here, but that's not what a lay person would understand to be the "value of a tag".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reword it to be a little more precise on what to expect there.
This is the same normative information currently found in the Tags document.
In the end there's no paragraph to talk about this informational string.
That's a rewritten section of a rule that exists in the Tags document.
Plus some cleaning.