Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss source of account identifiers from client's perspective #465

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 15, 2022

Conversation

jricher
Copy link
Collaborator

@jricher jricher commented Nov 10, 2022

Closes #461

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 10, 2022

Deploy Preview for gnap-core-protocol-editors-draft ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 69c2f3f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/gnap-core-protocol-editors-draft/deploys/6373f7f2b3cece00087565fc
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-465--gnap-core-protocol-editors-draft.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@@ -2308,6 +2333,13 @@ the client instance MUST use an identity protocol to request and receive additio
claims. The details of an identity protocol and associated schema
are outside the scope of this specification.

The client instance MUST interpret all subject information in the context of the AS that the
subject information is received from, as is discussed in {{SP80063C}}. For example, one AS could
Copy link
Collaborator

@fimbault fimbault Nov 15, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this reference necessary ?

I think we could mostly take the general idea, that those subject identifiers are asserted by the system at some point and no global (except maybe for public DIDs).

In practice this means: don't do a basic string comparison

Copy link
Collaborator

@fimbault fimbault left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure about the reference, or then specify precisely the part that's relevant

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing Details for Verificaton of Identity Information
2 participants