Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider removing load balancing requirement #11

Closed
chris-wood opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider removing load balancing requirement #11

chris-wood opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@chris-wood
Copy link

During IETF 109, @martinthomson pointed out that this requirement cuts a little too much into the solution space. There seemed to be support for removing this (controversial) bit as part of the core requirements.
achernya added a commit to achernya/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2021
@achernya
Simplify the Loadbalancing section
90d9f2b 
Previously, the loadbalancing section required multi-threaded and
multi-server capability. At the IETF 109 session, we concluded that
the multi-threaded aspects were at most an implementation detail and
likely not required. However, there was support for the
multi-session/multi-server capability, although likely as an
extension.

This commit updates the text to mention the mutli-session capability
as desirable, but explicitly calls out that implementing it may be an
extension. This addresses
ietf-wg-masque#9 and
ietf-wg-masque#11 by making this
optional.
@DavidSchinazi
Copy link
Collaborator

We wrote text in draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-01 that should address this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@chris-wood @DavidSchinazi