add section on ads #18
Conversation
| @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ author: | |||
| org: Tencent America LLC | |||
| country: United States of America | |||
| email: spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com | |||
| - | |||
| ins: M. Stock | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for submitting this text! Sorry for the slow review.
We've asked the chairs to weigh in on adding you as an author, hopefully will have some offline conversation on that shortly.
| @@ -187,6 +193,47 @@ under peak load? | |||
|
|
|||
| Provisioning issues for caching systems? | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Personalization and Advertizing | |||
|
|
|||
| Some of this fits better under adaptive bitrate, but most of it seems | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's probably a good idea to mark this kind of paragraph as TBD and/or [EDITOR: remove this paragraph], to make sure it doesn't accidentally end up in the final text.
Also: I'm thinking maybe the key personalization content fits better as a new top-level section after Adaptive Bitrate, rather than inside the "Bandwidth Provisioning" section?
| of the content selection, and the content variation are all of the | ||
| different bitrate renditions. | ||
|
|
||
| A similar but more complex case is the use of an ad selection service |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this paragraph is a good start, but we probably need more explanation about "targeting" in this context, and it might be beneficial to list sections with the different kinds of ads, with their pros and cons (server-side vs client-side ad insertion, and maybe a pointer to the iab.net specs for VPAID or something as an example of the kind of automated system for personalized ad insertion that is often used, maybe a mention of the variety of providers using realtime bidding to determine the selected content, and the drivers of the timing parameters that can have an impact on user experience?
|
To reiterate what I just said in the working group session - I did speak with @mattstock and he's OK with us adapting this as needed, despite no longer having bandwidth to work on it himself. If you'd like, I can open a new PR based on this one. |
|
My understanding is that we're deep in "dp the right thing" territory :-) |
Addressing @GrumpyOldTroll's [feedback][] on the original PR. [feedback]: ietf-wg-mops#18 (comment)
Addressing @GrumpyOldTroll's [feedback][] on the original PR. [feedback]: ietf-wg-mops#18 (comment)
Addressing @GrumpyOldTroll's [feedback][] on the original PR. [feedback]: ietf-wg-mops#18 (comment)
SpencerDawkins
added
duplicate
|
This was rebased as #85 - closing here. |
No description provided.