Less use of Title Case #224
Conversation
|
+1 this reads much more clearly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think we should take this change this late in the process. This document went through WGLC and the consensus at the time was to treat the terms as proper nouns. I don't think it's appropriate to change it now on the basis of a single review. Beyond that, I don't think this meaningfully improves readability, but I don't feel strongly about it.
|
Hm, I don't think this is an improvement — it particularly seems odd to force lowercase all of the terms in definitions, even where it seems more correct to have them capitalized. |
|
I Think It's An Improvement, But Obviously This Is A Matter Of Taste. |
We weren't always capitalizing "Encapsulated Request". This does more, in direct opposition to the changes in #224. If we don't take that (it seems we at an impasse there), then we should at least be consistent.
|
We're at something of an impasse here, so in the interests of getting shit done, I'm dropping this. I'll have to read through and find those tiny tweaks and apply them again. |
This is a big change, but I think that I like it. The cost is fairly minimal, but it reads a little better in my view.
Also, I fixed a few very minor typos. If we don't go this way, then I'll have to find those and fix them.
On the other hand, there are open pull requests that will need to be fixed in line with this change if we do.