-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added document outline and cause model diagram for neonatal sepsis. #76
Conversation
:alt: SI cause model diagram for neonatal sepsis and other infections | ||
|
||
|
||
Model Assumptions and Limitations |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the neural tube defects and NN Enceph, I moved this section to come after the Data Description section, in order to have the data tables be adjacent to the cause model diagram. What do other people think about the section ordering?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I kind of like it before the data description, because i like the idea of going from most high-level to most nitty-gritty as you go through the document. In that schema, in my mind, it would go:
model diagram,
then limitations,
then data description
(as kiran has).
If we wanted the diagram near the tables that reference it (which i also like), what if we did model diagram, then data descriptions, then limitations? to maintain some of the newspaper-style high level ---> detailed ordering?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here, I followed the template we used for measles model.
---------------------------- | ||
|
||
It is worth noting that the ICD 10 and ICD 9 codes used in non-fatal and fatal GBD models are different. | ||
The ICD 10 codes used in non fatal model are P36-P36.9, P38-P39.9. K29.0-K29.00, K29.1-K29.20, P77-P78.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The ICD 10 codes used in non fatal model are P36-P36.9, P38-P39.9. K29.0-K29.00, K29.1-K29.20, P77-P78.1 | |
The ICD 10 codes used in the non fatal model are P36-P36.9, P38-P39.9. The codes K29.0-K29.00, K29.1-K29.20, P77-P78.1 |
This was a bit hard to read with all the codes adjacent to each other. Editing this line and the next for clarity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is K29.0-K29.00 a range? or ==K29.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure. I am assuming its a range. I checked the ICD codes in the range. They seem relevant but couldn't find all of the codes in the range.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
K29.0 and K29.00 are different. K29.00 is "Acute gastritis without bleeding". K29.0 is "Acute gastritis"
|
||
It is worth noting that the ICD 10 and ICD 9 codes used in non-fatal and fatal GBD models are different. | ||
The ICD 10 codes used in non fatal model are P36-P36.9, P38-P39.9. K29.0-K29.00, K29.1-K29.20, P77-P78.1 | ||
codes are also used in hospital/claims analyses of non fatal model The ICD 9 codes used are 771, 771.4-771.89. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
codes are also used in hospital/claims analyses of non fatal model The ICD 9 codes used are 771, 771.4-771.89. | |
are also used in hospital/claims analyses for the non fatal model. The ICD 9 codes used are 771, 771.4-771.89. |
Minor edits for readability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is 771==771.0? This is a question I also had for neonatal other. I've emailed the CoD team's PO to ask about that notation---though if that way of describing ranges is common to ICD codes and someone on our team is familiar with it, that would be helpful to know!
For hospital/claims analyses, 535.0-535.00, 535.3-535.30, 777.5-777.7 are also used in addition to the above mentioned ICD 9 codes. | ||
While the fatal model uses only P36-P36.9, P38-P39.9 ICD 10 codes and 771.4-771.9 ICD 9 codes | ||
[GBD-2017-YLD-Capstone-Appendix-1-Neonatal-sepsis-and-other-infections]_, [GBD-2017-CoD-Appendix-1-Neonatal-sepsis-and-other-infections]_. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I am still confused about which codes were used where...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kiran and I had started to talk about this---but we should talk in coworking about whether these are important to list.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it look better if I add a table like in YLD appendix but two rows one for fatal and the other for non-fatal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added a table for ICD codes. Hope it looks better now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like Nathaniel's suggestions, and this is coming along nicely
Add more information and references. In particular, find data about differences in global and | ||
gbd definitions, global prevalence and relation to folic acid during pregnancy. | ||
|
||
Modeling Measles in GBD 2017 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be NN Sepsis instead of Measles. Or, if we follow James's suggestion for the cause model template, to avoid copy/paste errors like this, we could omit the cause name entirely and just call this section something like GBD 2017 Modeling Strategy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the tables make the ICD codes clearer. Looks good, @kiranklc , except for the name "Measles" in the GBD modeling section.
No description provided.