-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revisions arising from S-101 portrayal discussions #11
Comments
The answers to these questions will inform the path forward for S-101-Portrayal-subWG/Working-Documents#136; in particular we need to either add 53011-53024, or remove 53010. |
There has to be some kind of list of changes presented to the S-100 WG, be it as a table in a change proposal or in the usual comments form. If you can provide that list we can take it from there. Since the document is already being edited and a redline already exists, providing the changes in the form of (another) redline would be undesirable.
Is the GI registry up-to-date and guaranteed to be kept up-to-date? There is, I think a bigger problem here, if S-101 portrayal continues to be volatile close to the implementation date, and S-101 is treated as the de facto controlling specification for portrayal, it will be difficult for other products to be both ready and compatible on the implementation date. |
I don't think this is needed any more - S-98 Annex C receives issues from S-101PT as necessary and can be discussed here. Please reopen this if anything further is needed. |
List of revisions to be proposed by S-101 Project Team portrayal subgroup to be obtained.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: