Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seeing non-zero ACT value for a technology without any commodity linked to it #89

Closed
Jihoon opened this issue Sep 24, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@Jihoon
Copy link
Contributor

Jihoon commented Sep 24, 2018

I have a strange observation, which I want to clarify.

By mistake, I didn't put any 'renewable_potential' values for the historical hydro tec I defined ("hydro_hist") for the entire time horizon, which means its input commodity ("hydro_c_hist") dedicated to the tec has no ground. And input and output parameters were defined only from 1965 and on. But there was historical_new_capacity starting from 1950.

Then in the result, I found that ACT has a value for 2020 for the hydro capacity of year_vtg 1960. (lifetime 60 years). I guess there is a loophole where ACT can still show up when all the input/output/renewable_potential are not defined.
Shouldn't it still give zero ACT if there is no potential defined for modeling years?

@danielhuppmann
Copy link
Member

Thanks @Jihoon for spotting this issue. But because this issue is MESSAGE-specific, it should go to https://github.com/iiasa/message_ix. The ixmp repository should only be used for issues related to the database connection and generic data management topics.

@Jihoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jihoon commented Sep 24, 2018

Oops, I thought I was in message_ix. I'll reopen it there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants