Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite the input buffer. #264

Closed
Windblade-GR01 opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Rewrite the input buffer. #264

Windblade-GR01 opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Windblade-GR01
Copy link
Member

Windblade-GR01 commented May 23, 2021

Currently the input buffer present some problems that make it harder to execute commands.
This is show on these cases like #116.
And any improvements like ones done by NeatUnsou break the functionality of current one.

So to solve problems and allow improvements in the future a full command buffer rewrite is needed.
As compatibly with MUGEN is pority this new buffer would be fully backwards compatible with MUGEN chars.

@Windblade-GR01 Windblade-GR01 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 23, 2021
@Windblade-GR01 Windblade-GR01 self-assigned this May 23, 2021
@Orochikyocr
Copy link

I closed the issue about keeping 0.94-0.97 input parser as an optional. Once Gacel releases his own input parser it would be good to have an option on the config.json to choose between the two, while Gacel one will be the one turned on by default.

@Isakku
Copy link

Isakku commented Aug 13, 2022

I have a similar problem as in #116 with my chars
Except it's the opposite problem. When I press forward or backwards, I always get the same result as if I had pressed FF (double forwards) or BB (double backwards). It's really annoying me, I can't just simply walk, I'm always dashing!

EDIT
I must mention I just tried again on WIndows and found out this only happens to me on Linux! Inconsistent behavior huh?

@ikemen-engine ikemen-engine locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2023
@K4thos K4thos converted this issue into discussion #862 Jan 22, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants