Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ElementTree and the Universal Feed Parser are included in version control #3

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 5, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Fresh svn checkout from http://pydelicious.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
2. Notice that the elementtree and feedparser python modules are included
in the checkout

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I would expect those libraries to be listed as dependencies, instead.  You
don't really want to track changes to those external libraries, do you?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by mccutchen on 20 Oct 2006 at 4:25

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Good point.  I'm not sure what the best way to fix this is because I've never 
had a
good understanding of proper distrubution technique.  If anyone knows the best 
way to
distribute this software let me know, or go ahead and change it.

My reccomendation is to keep only this project's code in source control and then
occassionaly create a .gz/.zip file which includes the 3rd party libs and host 
it
else where for easy installation.

Original comment by gregpin...@gmail.com on 20 Oct 2006 at 5:10

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I would just distribute this project's source code and make it clear that 
ElementTree
and the Universal Feed Parser are required dependencies.  Maybe that's a little 
more
work for the user, but it's a lot less work for you.

Original comment by mccutchen on 7 Nov 2006 at 4:48

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I would just distribute this project's source code and make it clear that 
ElementTree
and the Universal Feed Parser are required dependencies.  Maybe that's a little 
more
work for the user, but it's a lot less work for you.

Original comment by mccutchen on 7 Nov 2006 at 4:55

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by dfdes...@gmail.com on 12 Oct 2007 at 4:56

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant