Switched gatt implementation (superuser no longer needed) + decoded status + python3 + ... #6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RESULT: superuser privileges for python no-longer needed gatt-python: https://github.com/getsenic/gatt-python
…()->disconnect()->connect())
…it's display blank timeout)
```
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/cometblue/cli.py", line 130
self._print_simple('Timeout in progress:\t%02u' % (value['current']))
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
I've ported the utility to use python3 with gatt-python library (dbus calls to bluez). However, there are some issues which pretty much reqiured to change the implementation of cli :-/ . Also, I've done some work on decoding the status bits and renamed the command. Please feel free to comment on.
The utility has been tested least by me for set+get+backup+restore. @miklik72 might be up to some testing as well (he's got a different model than I do) :-)
Regards, L.