Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Minimize time spent harmonizing Datasets/ImagePluses #86

Closed
ctrueden opened this issue Aug 20, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Minimize time spent harmonizing Datasets/ImagePluses #86

ctrueden opened this issue Aug 20, 2014 · 1 comment
Assignees
@maarzt
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
m1

Comments

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member

The IJ1 ↔️ IJ2 synchronization needs to be as efficient as possible. That said, we are no longer supporting use of ImageJ 1.x commands from modern ImageJ2 UIs. So we can probably get away with synchronizing things lazily, creating a lazily initialized IJ2 data structure shadowing IJ1, and vice versa, which gets populated only as needed when various methods are called.

Migrated-From: http://trac.imagej.net/ticket/546
@ctrueden ctrueden mentioned this issue Feb 24, 2015
Closed
@hinerm hinerm self-assigned this Mar 23, 2015
@hinerm hinerm added this to the m1 milestone Mar 23, 2015
@hinerm hinerm mentioned this issue Mar 23, 2015
Closed
@maarzt maarzt self-assigned this Apr 6, 2018
@ctrueden
Copy link
Member Author

I'm gonna close this, thanks to the merge of #182.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@maarzt maarzt

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
m1
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ctrueden @hinerm @maarzt