Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Relicensing with MIT license (patch release) #1309

Closed
leipert opened this issue Sep 26, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Relicensing with MIT license (patch release) #1309

leipert opened this issue Sep 26, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@leipert
Copy link

leipert commented Sep 26, 2017

Per this announcement [1] immutable.js will be re-licensed with the MIT license.

I just created the issue to track this.

[1]: https://code.facebook.com/posts/300798627056246/relicensing-react-jest-flow-and-immutable-js/
@leipert leipert changed the title Relicensing as MIT license Relicensing with MIT license Sep 27, 2017
@leebyron
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for creating the issue

leebyron pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2017
Relicense as MIT
6c1ae39 
* Change LICENSE file to MIT
* Change all source file headers to use MIT reference
* Remove PATENTS file
* Update README, CONTRIBUTING, publish scripts
* Update package.json
* Test: grep for BSD and PATENTS to find 0 remaining references

Closes #1309
@leebyron leebyron mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2017
Merged
leebyron added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2017
@leebyron
Relicense as MIT (#1320)
d3bce8d 
* Change LICENSE file to MIT
* Change all source file headers to use MIT reference
* Remove PATENTS file
* Update README, CONTRIBUTING, publish scripts
* Update package.json
* Test: grep for BSD and PATENTS to find 0 remaining references

Closes #1309
@mistercrunch
Copy link

Assuming semantic versioning (and breaking changes in 4.x), can we also get a 3.8.2 release under MIT?

Very grateful for the move to MIT and the awesome work out of FB!

mistercrunch added a commit to mistercrunch/superset that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2017
@mistercrunch
Bumping React to 15.6.2 (MIT license)
b6eeb41 
I think that leaves only immutable.js with the ASF-incompatible PATENTS clause

I asked for a 3.8.x MIT release of the immutable lib here:
immutable-js/immutable-js#1309
@leebyron leebyron reopened this Oct 2, 2017
@leebyron leebyron changed the title Relicensing with MIT license Relicensing with MIT license (patch release) Oct 2, 2017
@leebyron
Copy link
Collaborator

leebyron commented Oct 2, 2017

Reopened to track doing that as well

@mistercrunch mistercrunch mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2017
Merged
leebyron added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2017
@leebyron
CHERRY-PICK: d3bce8d onto v3.8.1
67a18dd 
Relicense as MIT (#1320)

* Change LICENSE file to MIT
* Change all source file headers to use MIT reference
* Remove PATENTS file
* Update README, CONTRIBUTING, publish scripts
* Update package.json
* Test: grep for BSD and PATENTS to find 0 remaining references

Closes #1309
@leebyron
Copy link
Collaborator

leebyron commented Oct 3, 2017

v3.8.2 with MIT license is now out!

@leebyron leebyron closed this as completed Oct 3, 2017
mistercrunch added a commit to apache/superset that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2017
@mistercrunch
Bumping React to 15.6.2 (MIT license) (#3569)
fdbc936 
I think that leaves only immutable.js with the ASF-incompatible PATENTS clause

I asked for a 3.8.x MIT release of the immutable lib here:
immutable-js/immutable-js#1309
michellethomas pushed a commit to michellethomas/panoramix that referenced this issue May 24, 2018
@mistercrunch @michellethomas
Bumping React to 15.6.2 (MIT license) (apache#3569)
41c18f4 
I think that leaves only immutable.js with the ASF-incompatible PATENTS clause

I asked for a 3.8.x MIT release of the immutable lib here:
immutable-js/immutable-js#1309
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@leebyron @mistercrunch @leipert