Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We need clear and concise guidelines for documentation writers #4

Closed
4 tasks done
timlinux opened this issue May 7, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed
4 tasks done

Comments

@timlinux
Copy link
Contributor

timlinux commented May 7, 2013

Problem

As more people participate in our documentation project there is scope for wildly different documentation styles and a general degradation of the quality of our documentation.

Currently we have http://inasafe.linfiniti.com/en/developer-docs/maintaining_documentation.html which provides some basic info on how to write documentation but it is not adequate to fully orientate new documentors into our system.

Proposed solution

  • split http://inasafe.linfiniti.com/en/developer-docs/maintaining_documentation.html into two - one document for API documentation style guide, one section for user documentation style guide.
  • Ensure the API documentation guide is self contained with outward links to rst and user documentation where relevant.
  • For end user documentation, detail the key markup elements that should be used and other important aspects that should be taken care of when writing sphinx documentation.
  • Add a new section on the procedures needed to setup a host (initially targetted to linux only) so that it is possible to compile the documentation locally.

See also

Issue #3

Expected Outcome

Providing clear guidelines and regularly auditing the documentation to ensure guideline compliance will prevent the documentation from losing quality over time

@ghost ghost assigned mach0 May 7, 2013
mach0 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2013
mach0 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2013
@mach0
Copy link
Contributor

mach0 commented Jun 5, 2013

Done with SHA: 95ed9d6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants