Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Another fxload which has -fx3 option is required to load qhy usb3 camera #257

Closed
JiangXL opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@JiangXL
Copy link

JiangXL commented Dec 11, 2020

Describe the bug
Although #252 enable my QHY5L-ll-M, but QHY163M is still fail to detect. I found that fedora's fxload hasn't fx3 to load usb3 firmware by RUN+="/sbin/fxload -t fx3 -I /lib/firmware/qhy/QHY163.img in rules file. QHY5L-ll-M only require fx2 option.

After searching at network, I find this reply from qhy.

Is it possible that build a new fxload in other copr or add fxload code inside libqhy?

Thanks.

To Reproduce

  1. Install libqhy, indi-qhy(don't use qhyccd sdk own installation script )
  2. Connect QHY163M(or other usb3 camera)
  3. Run indi

Expected behavior
Indi show that no camera was found.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Fedora 33
  • Version: from fedora copr
@JiangXL JiangXL added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 11, 2020
@JiangXL
Copy link
Author

JiangXL commented Dec 11, 2020

USB3 compatible fxload can be found in https://github.com/libusb/libusb/blob/master/examples/fxload.c

@xsnrg
Copy link
Collaborator

xsnrg commented Dec 11, 2020

The best course of action would be to open a request against Fedora upstream. In the short term I can look at building it in another copr, but it may be some days yet.

@JiangXL
Copy link
Author

JiangXL commented Dec 11, 2020 via email

@xsnrg
Copy link
Collaborator

xsnrg commented Dec 12, 2020

@knro
Copy link
Collaborator

knro commented Sep 28, 2021

This is downstream issue, not an INDI issue per se.

@knro knro closed this as completed Sep 28, 2021
@JiangXL
Copy link
Author

JiangXL commented Sep 28, 2021

Actually, I find that indi=3rdparty has fxload-libusb and fxload modules. @xsnrg How about packaging these?

@xsnrg
Copy link
Collaborator

xsnrg commented Sep 28, 2021

This really needs to be updated in the main repo. I poked the ticket listed above again. It sounds like the path was clear and maybe it just needed a nudge. The fxload in indi-3rdparty is also from 2008.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants