New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Force Sphinx 4 #38
Force Sphinx 4 #38
Conversation
8ed6c8a is unrelated and can be spun off into a separate PR (?). I just added them while trying to convince sphinx to add annotations selectively (didn't work). |
Yikes! Why would it remove the types from the signature? That's dumb. Let's get rid of it. (21eab4b) Btw, I think we went through pretty much the same process with |
Also, thanks for working on this! |
Also, why not: inducer/ci-support@e0402f6, |
8ed6c8a is great btw. Thanks for that. It can totally stay. |
It sort of does what it says on the tin, i.e.
Yeah, it seems that it adds |
IME it doesn't if you add |
I meant the way it shows up below, for example. That chunk of docs should have a |
OIC. But if you click, you go to |
Definitely, I'm very happy with the improvements already. Don't get to have a negative diff very often! 🎉 |
@inducer Potentially interesting until they update the type annotation |
Thanks for the suggestion! The current state is usable though IMO, no way I'm doing another 30 PRs. :) |
Was trying to see if the
:canonical:
thing in Sphinx 4 actually works. At least locally, this seems to generate the docs without warnings.