Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need to support RFC 3023: "XML Media Types" #46

Open
rlebeau opened this issue Apr 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Need to support RFC 3023: "XML Media Types" #46

rlebeau opened this issue Apr 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rlebeau
Labels
Element: HTTP Issues related to HTTP handling, TIdHTTP, TIdHTTPServer, TIdHTTPProxyServer, etc Element: MIME Issues related to MIME handling Status: Review Needed Issue needs further review to decide next status Type: Enhancement Issue is proposing a new feature/enhancement

Comments

@rlebeau
Copy link
Member

rlebeau commented Apr 5, 2017

RFC 3023 defines the semantics of XML media types in HTTP and MIME processing. In particular, how the XML content's charset should be determined when omitted from a Content-Type header. These rules differ from other RFCs that define default charsets for textual data.
@rlebeau rlebeau added Type: Enhancement Issue is proposing a new feature/enhancement Element: HTTP Issues related to HTTP handling, TIdHTTP, TIdHTTPServer, TIdHTTPProxyServer, etc Element: MIME Issues related to MIME handling labels Apr 5, 2017
@rlebeau rlebeau self-assigned this Apr 5, 2017
@rlebeau rlebeau changed the title Need to support RFC 3023 Need to support RFC 3023: "XML Media Types" Aug 6, 2021
@rlebeau rlebeau added the Status: Review Needed Issue needs further review to decide next status label Apr 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rlebeau rlebeau

Labels
Element: HTTP Issues related to HTTP handling, TIdHTTP, TIdHTTPServer, TIdHTTPProxyServer, etc Element: MIME Issues related to MIME handling Status: Review Needed Issue needs further review to decide next status Type: Enhancement Issue is proposing a new feature/enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rlebeau