You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It uses PhpUnit underneath, so it should be relatively straightforward to support.
An issue has been created in Pest for this, however looking at the discussion it also seems like infection prefers the package to be under their organisation. pestphp/pest#4
Problems
Some major issues for supporting Pest without any changes in pest, is that the TestFrameworkConfigLocator is determining based on the config name.
However Pest is build on PhpUnit, so their config file is actually also just named phpunit.xml. (This can be solved in Pest by Pest allowing a config file named pest.xml and then infection would only work if you rename your config file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems like I had some progress with that issue - pestphp/pest#48 (comment) - but it still requires more work, probably from someone who is familiar with Pest, as currently Junit report doesn't work as expected, but Infection requires it.
After this issue is resolved, I can continue work on creating an adapter
PestPHP is a testing framework inspired by JEST.
It uses PhpUnit underneath, so it should be relatively straightforward to support.
An issue has been created in Pest for this, however looking at the discussion it also seems like infection prefers the package to be under their organisation. pestphp/pest#4
Problems
Some major issues for supporting Pest without any changes in pest, is that the
TestFrameworkConfigLocator
is determining based on the config name.However Pest is build on PhpUnit, so their config file is actually also just named
phpunit.xml
. (This can be solved in Pest by Pest allowing a config file namedpest.xml
and then infection would only work if you rename your config file.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: