ISPN-14817 Move some Hot Rod client tests to the server testsuite #10869
Conversation
tristantarrant
force-pushed
the
ISPN-14817/move_client_tests
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2440d45
to
9f49705
Compare
tristantarrant
force-pushed
the
ISPN-14817/move_client_tests
branch
from
9f49705
to
e595312
Compare
* ClusteredIT: incorporate ExtensionsIT suite run in CONTAINER mode
* HotRodCacheOperations: incorporate APITest and RemoteAsyncAPITest. Parameterized for protocol versions and types
* HotRodCacheQueries: incorporate ProtobufHotRodRestEntityIT
* HotRodCacheEvents: incorporate JsonEventsTest, ClientEventsTest, ClientFilterEventsTest, ClientCustomEventsTest,
ClientClusterEventsTest
* SslTest, SslAuthenticationTest, SecureExecTest: removed as more in-depth tests are already present in the server testsuite
tristantarrant
force-pushed
the
ISPN-14817/move_client_tests
branch
from
e595312
to
d633b9d
Compare
|
Failures are unrelated |
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi-minimal | |||
| FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi-minimal | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We actually use ubi8 for the upstream images, as we needed to baseline the JDK based image on that for Openshift compatibility. That being said, I should probably upgrade the cli and server-native images to ubi9 as we don't have similar downstream considerations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually a reason to stick with ubi8 is that the builder image we rely on ubi-quarkus-native-image is based upon ubi8, so it would be good to test with the same runtime image. I'll look into updating the modules to use container based native compilation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, that's a leftover from running it on my local box which has a much newer glibc than CI.
|
Thanks @tristantarrant |
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ISPN-14817
Part 1 of many. Do not close the Jira