Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ISPN-6436 Overriding the name of an indexed property is not supported with DSL query #4226

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

anistor
Copy link
Member

@anistor anistor commented Apr 9, 2016

@anistor anistor added the Preview label Apr 9, 2016
@anistor anistor added this to the 9.0.0.Alpha1 milestone Apr 9, 2016
@anistor anistor force-pushed the t_6436_m branch 28 times, most recently from 1d3ab41 to 0073db2 Compare April 14, 2016 16:25
@anistor anistor changed the title [pls ignore] ISPN-6436 Overriding the name of an indexed property is not supported with DSL query ISPN-6436 Overriding the name of an indexed property is not supported with DSL query Apr 19, 2016
@gustavocoding
Copy link

gustavocoding commented Apr 20, 2016

There are some familiar commits in this PR, should it be rebased on master instead?

@anistor
Copy link
Member Author

anistor commented Apr 20, 2016

I'll rebase. I thought I already did that...

@anistor
Copy link
Member Author

anistor commented Apr 20, 2016

Not sure why github.com UI shows more commits. Should be only 2. Pls fetch again.

@anistor
Copy link
Member Author

anistor commented Apr 20, 2016

Now it looks ok. Only 2 commits.

@anistor anistor force-pushed the t_6436_m branch 2 times, most recently from ca42286 to a86b236 Compare April 21, 2016 12:23
//todo validate params
for (String paramName : getParameterNames()) {
if (namedParameters.get(paramName) == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Query parameter '" + paramName + "' was not set");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably we need some internationalization here.

@slaskawi
Copy link
Contributor

Only some small picky issues. Otherwise looks ok to me.

@anistor
Copy link
Member Author

anistor commented Apr 25, 2016

Fixed all.

@anistor anistor force-pushed the t_6436_m branch 3 times, most recently from cf129ab to 352e351 Compare April 26, 2016 15:05
@anistor
Copy link
Member Author

anistor commented Apr 26, 2016

Rebased.

@gustavocoding
Copy link

pulling

@gustavocoding
Copy link

merged, thanks @anistor !

@anistor anistor deleted the t_6436_m branch April 27, 2016 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants