New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ISPN-7362 Use no-bundler in the default UDP configuration #4763
Conversation
run performance tests please |
Performance tests run successfully. Link to the results here. |
89fc620
to
3414b80
Compare
run performance tests please |
@danberindei Results were successfully generated, just ignore the C/S part: Link to the report here Just to clarify - these are the results from your previous request, currently there is one more test in progress triggered by my comment above. Estimated finish in 1 hour. |
Performance tests run successfully. Link to the results here. |
3414b80
to
e803383
Compare
Results with no-bundler look good. Keeping transfer-queue and re-adding DONT_BUNDLE didn't improve anything. |
e803383
to
77b40f1
Compare
@danberindei which results are you looking at? in the latest results, there is no improvement (actually, it is worse) |
@pruivo I reused the PR to test the transfer-queue bundler with the DONT_BUNDLE flag, and that's what the latest results show. The only run with no-bundler is http://perfrepo.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/reports/tableComparisonReport/4716 |
b0d2ff6
to
2fd2881
Compare
2fd2881
to
52f6c3d
Compare
Pushed, thanks |
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7362