Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support for websocket #9

Closed
sehz opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

support for websocket #9

sehz opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request protocol support
Milestone

Comments

@sehz
Copy link
Contributor

sehz commented Sep 19, 2019

access fluvio using websocket protocol

@sehz sehz added enhancement New feature or request protocol support labels Dec 5, 2019
nicholastmosher referenced this issue in nicholastmosher/fluvio Feb 4, 2021
* update fluvio service to use no default feature of fluvio socket
* fix zero copy test by using static test file rather than dynamic file
to get around issue with flush
nicholastmosher referenced this issue in nicholastmosher/fluvio Feb 4, 2021
* update fluvio service to use no default feature of fluvio socket
* fix zero copy test by using static test file rather than dynamic file
to get around issue with flush
sehz added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2021
* update fluvio service to use no default feature of fluvio socket
* fix zero copy test by using static test file rather than dynamic file
to get around issue with flush
@simlay simlay added this to the 1.0-alpha milestone Feb 23, 2021
simlay pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2021
* update fluvio service to use no default feature of fluvio socket
* fix zero copy test by using static test file rather than dynamic file
to get around issue with flush
@sehz sehz modified the milestones: 1.0-alpha, 0.8.5 Jun 7, 2021
@simlay
Copy link
Contributor

simlay commented Jun 14, 2021

Using https://github.com/infinyon/fluvio-client-wasm/tree/main/fluvio-websocket-proxy, this is done for a local cluster. Is there more we need to do?

@sehz
Copy link
Contributor Author

sehz commented Jun 14, 2021

We can make it as done. Great job

@sehz sehz closed this as completed Jun 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request protocol support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants