Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

plan to support 0.9 #104

Closed
dashesy opened this issue Feb 16, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

plan to support 0.9 #104

dashesy opened this issue Feb 16, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@dashesy
Copy link

dashesy commented Feb 16, 2015

Is there any plan to support 0.9 any time soon?
as can be seen here it is now possible to have top-level key/values for things like tags and timestamp in the same level that database exists but I cannot find how to do it in current version of influxdb-client.

@aviau aviau self-assigned this Feb 17, 2015
@aviau
Copy link
Collaborator

aviau commented Feb 17, 2015

For now, you will be able to use this functionnality via the write function (see be476a4).

When 0.9.0 is out, a backwards-incompatible release of this lib will be made to support the new endpoint with the write_points function.

I'll be committing in the 0.9.0_support branch in the next few days. I hope to have it working by monday.

@otoolep
Copy link

otoolep commented Feb 28, 2015

@ReAzem -- please reach out to me as needed, to get 0.9 support added to the Python library. I've written a fair amount of Python in my time, so can review coded as needed.

The API docs, in case you haven't seen them, are here:

http://influxdb.com/docs/v0.9/introduction/getting_started.html

@aviau
Copy link
Collaborator

aviau commented Feb 28, 2015

@otoolep -- Thank you, If I have questions, I'll contact you. Are you available on IRC? I am always on freenode #influxdb as reazem. I'll test again but I couldn't get UDP working when I tested.

@dashesy
The core functions of the lib now work with 0.9. I am closing I am inviting follow #109 for more details.

@aviau aviau closed this as completed Feb 28, 2015
@otoolep
Copy link

otoolep commented Mar 1, 2015

Email is best @ReAzem -- I don't tend to be on IRC that much.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants