Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Also include NEQ in filters #2104

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2015
Merged

Also include NEQ in filters #2104

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2015

Conversation

otoolep
Copy link
Contributor

@otoolep otoolep commented Mar 28, 2015

This fixes != for field value comparisons.

@@ -588,6 +588,21 @@ func runTestsData(t *testing.T, testName string, nodes Cluster, database, retent
expected: `{"results":[{"series":[{"name":"cpu","tags":{"region":"us-east"},"columns":["time","mean"],"values":[["1970-01-01T00:00:00Z",15]]},{"name":"cpu","tags":{"region":"us-west"},"columns":["time","mean"],"values":[["1970-01-01T00:00:00Z",30]]}]}]}`,
},

// WHERE tag queries
{
reset: true,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some = unit tests for tags. These always worked, but I wanted some tests.

@otoolep
Copy link
Contributor Author

otoolep commented Mar 28, 2015

@pauldix @dgnorton

if n.Op == influxql.EQ || n.Op == influxql.LT || n.Op == influxql.LTE || n.Op == influxql.GT ||
n.Op == influxql.GTE || n.Op == influxql.EQREGEX || n.Op == influxql.NEQREGEX {
switch n.Op {
case influxql.EQ, influxql.LT, influxql.LTE, influxql.GT, influxql.GTE, influxql.EQREGEX, influxql.NEQREGEX, influxql.NEQ:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix is here -- add influxql.NEQ. I also changed to the code to use switch -- I think it's easier to read now.

@@ -475,6 +475,8 @@ func (m *Measurement) walkWhereForSeriesIds(expr influxql.Expr, filters map[uint

// finally return the ids and say that we should include them
return ids, true, nil
default:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This may not be the right thing to do, but it would have flagged the bug immediately.

@otoolep otoolep force-pushed the various_fixes branch 2 times, most recently from 74c0175 to 0757bf3 Compare March 28, 2015 06:03
@pauldix
Copy link
Member

pauldix commented Mar 28, 2015

LGTM, 🚢. Since you were adding test cases for queries against tags, it wouldn't hurt to add some that test against multiple tags using AND and OR operators.

@otoolep
Copy link
Contributor Author

otoolep commented Mar 28, 2015

Let me get back to that -- I'm working on tags in #2105, and will add more tests there.

otoolep added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2015
@otoolep otoolep merged commit caf3259 into master Mar 28, 2015
@toddboom toddboom deleted the various_fixes branch May 5, 2015 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants