You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several specifications in the examples repository are using the LAMBDA-syntax. For instance, SlidingPuzzles defines the operator move(p, d) as follows (the type annotations are introduced by me):
[SlidingPuzzlesTyped.tla:47:42-47:61]:Undefinedname LAMBDA. Introduce a typeannotation.
Currently, the type checker just ignores the LAMBDA syntax. It probably can be just substituted with a LET-IN definition. In this case, the type checker would automatically infer the types inside LAMBDA.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Several specifications in the examples repository are using the LAMBDA-syntax. For instance, SlidingPuzzles defines the operator
move(p, d)
as follows (the type annotations are introduced by me):The type checker produces the following error:
Currently, the type checker just ignores the LAMBDA syntax. It probably can be just substituted with a LET-IN definition. In this case, the type checker would automatically infer the types inside LAMBDA.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: