Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0][ADD] stock_product_orderpoint #48

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2017
Merged

[8.0][ADD] stock_product_orderpoint #48

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2017

Conversation

ivantodorovich
Copy link
Contributor

Copie el código tal cual estaba del respositorio oficial, y funcionó bien.
Fijate que te parece, lo probe aca y anduvo.

Lo que vi es que en la 9.0, si bien agrega estos campos calculados, no los agrega a la vista tree.
Yo sí hice esto acá.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 61.014% when pulling e95c700 on ivantodorovich:8.0 into a67ca9f on ingadhoc:8.0.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #48 into 8.0 will decrease coverage by -0.61%.
The diff coverage is 41.17%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              8.0      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.62%   61.01%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files          27       28       +1     
  Lines         555      572      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits          342      349       +7     
- Misses        213      223      +10
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stock_product_orderpoint/product.py 41.17% <41.17%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a67ca9f...e95c700. Read the comment docs.

@jjscarafia jjscarafia merged commit 117bbe1 into ingadhoc:8.0 Feb 20, 2017
@jjscarafia
Copy link
Member

Perfecto, la seguimos por la incidencia!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants